|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Quick links to products available in the Campaign for Genital Integrity . . .
|
Rabbi Admits: Circumcision Abusive, Mutilating, Violates Human Rights
Eli Ungar-Sargon's video documentary, Cut:
Slicing through the Myths, offers an intimate look at circumcision in
the Jewish community. As well as exploring the anatomy, functions and
benefits of the foreskin, Ungar-Sargon poses direct and challenging
questions to his father and others about genital cutting of unconsenting
boys. He uncovers the rationalizations offered for what is increasingly
regarded by many Jewish men as a human rights violation.
In a particularly revealing conversation, Rabbi Hershy Worch admits that genital cutting of boys is, on the one hand, abusive, mutilating and a human rights violation, but on the other hand, claims it can be excused simply by being "in a covenant". Beginning at 50:50 in the video, this is a transcript of Rabbi Worch's statements in the context of a larger discussion about the anatomical, physiological and neurological damage caused by circumcision. Immediately preceding this scene the filmmaker interviews his father, a rabbi, who posed the question: "What is the reason one does ritual activities, even some that inflict pain on others?"
We know from the Global Survey of Circumcision Harm that circumcision poses immediate dangers to children and has long-term adverse physical, sexual and emotional/psychological consequences to men. But the bottom line according to Rabbi Worch is: The recitation of prayers, invocation of 'religious tradition', and claims of religious freedom somehow exempt Jews from universal laws and human rights considerations that would otherwise be imposed on other adults who don't have a 'license to mutilate'. The idea that any abuse, mutilation or human rights violation can be excused simply by claiming religious freedom has never been found to be acceptable by a court of law. Specifically, the legality of circumcising a normal, healthy male child, whether for religious reasons or not, has to our knowledge NEVER been examined in ANY court of law. Update (2012 June 26: German Court Rules Circumcising an Infant is Physical Assault - Business Insider International) The widespread belief that circumcision is an untouchable "right of religious freedom" is so pervasive that it often prevents such cases from reaching the courts. Example: On July 28, 2011 Judge Loretta Giorgi of San Francisco's Civil Court removed an initiative from the San Francisco city ballot that would have allowed a public vote to protect the genital integrity of males under the age of 18 from genital cutting (the genital integrity of females is already protected by Federal law). Giorgi's hastily ordered judgment was based on the presumption that male circumcision is a Constitutionally protected form of religious freedom. Yet the U.S. Supreme Court and the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics both agreed that:
At this point readers may be asking the question: If, like the rest of
humanity, Jews who practice circumcision are to be accorded the same
protections of international human rights treaties and conventions, should
they also be expected to uphold those same standards when it comes to the
universal human right to bodily integrity? If the answer is
"Yes", then we all need to listen closer to the voices of Jewish
men like Eliyahu Ungar-Sargon, who are advocating for an end to genital
cutting and the adoption of a non-cutting Bris
Shalom ceremony to welcome future generations of males into the
community of Jews. |
||||
|
Back to Cycle of Abuse: Faces of Circumcision Main Page
Top of Page | Home | Updates | FAQ | Research |
Education
| Advocacy | Litigation | Search
| Ideas | For
Media | Videos
| Bookstore |
FactFinder
Your Rights | Attorneys for the Rights of the Child
| Video
Excerpt | Dads | FGC Experts | Position
Statement | Harm Form | Class Action
Last updated: 28 November, 2013
© 1998-2021 NOHARMM. All rights reserved. Questions, or problems
using this site? Webmaster